FANDOM

Gergő90

aka b_gergely

Blocked
  • I live in Mezőberény, Hungary
  • I was born on February 24
  • My occupation is Editor
  • I am Man
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Despite several warnings, you persist in doing delete nominations the vandal way (blanking the page instead of adding the delete tag, and just saying "delete" without giving a reason). If I for one am going to delete a page, I want to know why it needs to be deleted; I am never under any circumstances going to delete a page for no reason.

    You are even converting pages with valid delete nominations (such as the Kung Fu Panda 5 page) to invalid nominations, by removing all content including the stated delete reason. This in particular is quite obviously vandalism.

    In the case of Trolls (Trolls), you failed to take into account why it was nominated for deletion; the fact that it's just a blank page, with no content except an infobox. This may have been allowed on this wiki before, but not on my watch. I added the delete notice to alert others to the endangered status of the page as it stands, to encourage somebody to add content; by removing the tag, you are keeping that page's danger of deletion.

    You are also unaware of the fact that one of the ground rules of delete nominations is that delete tags must not be removed without properly discussing the issue.

    You need to read Nominating for deletion; there's a right way and a(t least one) wrong way before you do any more edits. Failing to amend your behaviour will result in a longer block.

      Loading editor
    • *Sighs* I did try to tell this user back in 2016 that they were acting against their better judgement. Pity they never listened.

        Loading editor
    • C.Syde65 wrote: *Sighs* I did try to tell this user back in 2016 that they were acting against their better judgement. Pity they never listened.

      I am hoping that being subject to an actual block, rather than just more harsh words, may bring this user to his senses (assuming he has any). If not, as I already said a further block is sure to be effective.

        Loading editor
    • Evilquoll wrote:
      Despite several warnings, you persist in doing delete nominations the vandal way (blanking the page instead of adding the delete tag, and just saying "delete" without giving a reason). If I for one am going to delete a page, I want to know why it needs to be deleted; I am never under any circumstances going to delete a page for no reason.

      You are even converting pages with valid delete nominations (such as the Kung Fu Panda 5 page) to invalid nominations, by removing all content including the stated delete reason. This in particular is quite obviously vandalism.

      In the case of Trolls (Trolls), you failed to take into account why it was nominated for deletion; the fact that it's just a blank page, with no content except an infobox. This may have been allowed on this wiki before, but not on my watch. I added the delete notice to alert others to the endangered status of the page as it stands, to encourage somebody to add content; by removing the tag, you are keeping that page's danger of deletion.

      You are also unaware of the fact that one of the ground rules of delete nominations is that delete tags must not be removed without properly discussing the issue.

      You need to read Nominating for deletion; there's a right way and a(t least one) wrong way before you do any more edits. Failing to amend your behaviour will result in a longer block.

      I don't care what you say, but you're not going to block it either because you're the vandalist and not me.

        Loading editor
    • Gergő90 wrote: I don't care what you say, but you're not going to block it either because you're the vandalist and not me.

      Wrong; the fact that I had already blocked you contradicts your delusion that I am not going to block you again. I had wondered if I had been too heavy-handed with your block, but your dumb response indicating your "everyone's out of step except me" attitude, and your refusal to correct your mistakes and move on, has removed all doubt on that score.

      Goodbye. You won't be missed.

        Loading editor
  • Gergö90, did you have a deviantart account

      Loading editor
  • As a revenge, Netflix will decided to returning the 5th and 6th seasons of The Mr. Peabody and Sherman Show and also Dawn of the Croods and one more Season of All Hail King Julien like this: https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/coming-soon/dreamworks-series-and-movies-coming-to-netflix-in-2018/

      Loading editor
    RRabbit42
    RRabbit42 closed this thread because:
    old issue, and the person asking the question was unwilling to listen
    06:26, July 16, 2018
  • Hey I'm Jon Meyer and i loved all the screencaps of the Rocky and Bullwinkle short. Have you ever thought of showing all of them on a website called Disney screencaps dot com? It has all screencaps of movies and shorts from DreamWorks Disney Warner Bros. and more. If you do have an account on it or not it would be wonderful to see all those screencaps on that website. Have a nice day.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why?!?!!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The correct way to nominate a page for deletion is to add the delete tag to the page. No matter how badly you feel that the page needs to be deleted, you do not replace the page contents with the tag, thereby denying others the opportunity to judge for themselves; doing it that way is vandalism, and could result in your getting blocked.

    Also, you need to have a reason for nominating the page, and this reason must be stated in the delete nomination.

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.